On Naive Conservatism and Traditionalism

Ferdinand Bardamu, the famous populist-controversialist blogger posted up this scathing rebuke on a Jezebel Yenta, pissing into her own eyes whilst trying to piss on the socially deemed target of men, in the usual process of trying to guilt them into "Manning up", a subsect of the popular tactic for cougar days dating guru, also known as Feminist Shaming Language. One thing feminists fail to recognise is that White Men are so used to and resentfully tuned into this strategy, especially on the web, that they will take any excuse to lay into a bitch. The mind has been desensitised to the tactic, and replaced by a barely dormant hostility.

But indeed, this tactic is not limited to feminists alone. I agree with Ferd on this, the tendencies of traditionalists and conservatives towards becoming like craven sycophants towards jumping on the man-blamin' bandwagon on societal ills. While I haven't exactly touched on this issue as much as I would have liked, it is one I feel strongly about. While it is very true that these groups and pseudo-ideologies have started to degrade some of these conservative/Christian/traditionalist/WN communities, it is not true that the majority of conservative thought has been penetrated by the spiked strap-on called feminism, but the face, the presentable image in the Media, has been wholly subverted by cultural Marxism.

Like most ideologies, it seems like the majority of mainstream (read, politically correct) conservative or traditionalist movements harbor the kind of mangina-esque qualities that Ferd alludes to in his article, but just like our portion of the blogosphere (in comparison to the mainstream media) , the presented image of various movements in the public forum is in its diluted, multiculti PC-approved format, not in its true-to-life form. And with everything, you of course have a lot of hanger on groups who acquiesce to mainstream standards of self-censorship, and follow that model gratuitously. And then there's straight up subversion.

Whether men should have an implicit responsibility to society as a whole is somewhat debatable, but men do not have a responsibility to a system which seeks his marginalisation at every turn.

The conclusion posited here by Dennis Mangan is spot on, men have no incentive to be productive in this society and "man up", adhering to the traditional role. White men, that is. But if we go the Roissy route, our dark-skinned amigos, slowly growing in numbers, will play the feminists lapdogs for a while and then rip a new anus on society when they number high enough- and while we- the enlightened few, the happy few, withdrawn into our sluts, our jacuzzis, our sexbots and VR video games, representatively absent, will get a rude awakening in times to come.

But one thing I have noticed in young Gen Y intellectuals is that not uncommonly, the libertarianism that so many hold dear these days commonly crosses over to some form of conservatism, that also carries strong anti-feminist traditions, embedded as a meme. This reactionary stance to the highly individualised, egalitarian, solipsistic cultural viewpoint will, in this blogger's view, coagulate in a relative cultural regression, a reversion back to the norms of old West. In times of struggle, people resurrect and withdraw to means and modes that work, and why should our future be any deviation to that?

The real bargain in a traditionally structured culture in a society is that of social stability, common respect for each genders role, gender interdependence opposed to dissociation and conflict, and a sense of reliability within the community. Contrasted with what we have now, which is massive instability, self-absorption, gender competition and hostility, and a vapidly isolated, neglected community culture. Ultimately, individual preference matters for nil, as it cannot make a society function correctly.

Chinese Immigrants Start Political Party in NZ

In Botany, a small group of Chinese immigrants have set up a political party. The following ought to speak volumes to any NZ WN or sensible Kiwis:

"One of the major reasons I'm working with them is that they are going to work with the Maori Party," Thompson ([a political veteran of the Maori Party] said.
"Maori and Asians have always been minorities and we have never, ever had the power to make decision by ourselves."

 Nah. Just ignore the Treaty of Waitangi settlements, sacred Maori land, multicultural circle jerks, welfare payouts and endless White toleration.

My predictions are that, provided this gains momentum, this party will formulate into an ethnic voting block of Chinese immigrants using leverage to secure things such as more Chinese immigrants in New Zealand, Chinese spoken by crucial services, and more pandering to the Chinese government on economic issues and trade contracts. The latter is especially an important point to consider:

Party co-founder Stephen Ching, a former Labour candidate, said the party had powerful backers including the man who was behind the failed Crafar farm bid, Jack Chen.

Stop me if I'm paranoid, but I see this as merely the Chinese government or its backers trying to secure a foothold in NZ politics, our fragile democracy. The First Pass the Post seems to be certainly conducive towards allowing representative power to ideologically-minded groups.

Apparently we've a few years behind the times, just enforcing the idea in my mind that New Zealand is still in the early stages of multiculturalism in relation to our Western friends, and we still have time to slink out of the loosening noose on our necks.

America and the Romans

A recent reading of Adrian Goldworthy's Fall of the West has brought to mind the numerous and distinct similarities between the ancient Roman empire and the United States empire. Though many would argue the US is not the Roman empire, which I am in full agreement with, my major point of interest are not in the distinguishing features, but in the eerily similiar commonalities between the two powers, especially with their relative declines. And some of the contributing or symptomatic factors of the Roman decline seem to look all too familiar.

Thus far, I can conclude that Rome's inherent political instability was the deciding factor of its demise; The nature of the Roman entity was one that was inherently and fatalistically divisive; Rome suffered, as empires so inclined, from sheer vastness, its sheer geographic magnitude served as more of a source of internal division and conflict than a strength, and paved the road for empirical rupture accodomatingly. At the conclusion of the Western empire, the emperor himself was reduced merely to that of a figurehead, a persona secured only by the allegiance of the general of the day and his stalwart regiment of troops. The same dynamic is visible in modern America, whose landscape is but an absurd caricature of thinly veiled antagonism and division. For the average man or woman, there is but two ideological spectrums, a hefty liberal bias at one end, and a conservative one at the other. Not only is America racially segregated, but severely by political affiliation. This ideological isolation, exacerbated by multiculturalism and the media that fuels it, helps to aggravate the symptoms of this very social sickness.

New York, much like the city center of imperial Rome, the preening and symbolic capital of America to the rest of the world, the teeming trade center of the US, the home of the vampires of finance, a neo-Marxist elites, profiting from usury and manipulating the securities of working Americans, exploiting nothing but human livestock to them, is the worm-infested core of the United Soviet State of America. Compounding misery, this empirical hub was symbolically sacked by the lowest and scummiest barbarians. Nine-eleven to me exemplified two parts of the worst part of the elite's American culture coming home to roost: Multiculturalist immigration policies with no integration policy, and backdoor American interference in other countries. An impressive deficiency maintains in the wake of the symbolic destruction of New York, the razing of the World Trade center, a monument to the might and audacity of North American economic muscle, an impregnable structure of awe-inspiring size looking down on the world, instead, in its obliterated state, to be overshadowed by the now unmentioned Park 51. Nine Eleven was an attack geared towards symbolic pillaging, the destruction wreaked worth more than the sum of its damage on infrastructure.

But the consequences of such an event lies remote in the mind of the average Joe. We don't see American youths taking to the street in fiery conflict over ridiculous student loans, the pension pyramid scheme, or the present and projected marginalisation of Whites. Like the rest of us and like the ancient Roman proletariat (thought they were known to riot when their food reserves were down), the bulk of American Whites have their hands tied.

The place I'd draw the boldest distinction between the USA and the Roman empire is in the usage of information, and in the way that that information is transferred to the people from the state.  The media makes the difference in its control of the masses. The rapidity and sophistry with which the state and major corporate interests puts the public within their psychological reach is astounding. This medium allows for the powers to be to covertly transform the minds and hearts of their constituency at their whim and will. For instance, take the effect of television on the self-image and perspective of Indian women as outlined in the book Superfreakonomics, which, upon viewing their Western counterparts in US sitcoms, had the effect of depressing birth rates and decreasing spousal violence. Indeed, the Idiot box is a powerful tool, putting the masses' minds at the disposal of those who control it.

The blame of American psychological decadence and apathy can be laid partially at the feet of the education system. This governmental system, with a barely reputable accord, is used primarily as an indoctrination factory, churning out soft-core brainwashees, destined to elated performance of their ideological duty and have just the minimal amount of education to pass through life comfortably, without a shred of knowledge about their true purpose.


Although there are many similarities and differences between the ancient Roman empire and the present day USA, one thing that never changes is the essence of power itself. The societal masters' ability in the seizure and maintenance of the collective attentions of the masses may change, and the ability of different groups to seize it may alternate, but the will to power itself maintains, an unsubvertable human trait, eternally. This is a fundamental lesson to the modern man.

Latest Kiwi Killed in Afghanistan

Yup, we have hit number six. Oddly enough, he was born in Western Samoa, which begs the question; how much of our armed forces are composed of foreign-born men and women? Paints a slightly disturbing picture for me, though at least it isn't another White Male dying heroically without a genetic legacy to leave behind.

Would someone care to remind me why we're in Afghanistan? At least we have a "good reason" for being in Iraq.

Mega Metal Mash up 2

 Here we go again...

Negation of Self, Desolation of Soul

Lately, I have had a lot of thoughts about what the typical family life is and was like for the average White Gen Y. The bulk of my growing up was in the faux-boom of the 1990s, the last misleading spark of a dying era and civilisation, leading into the mild delirium that was the 2000s. My family was a fairly regular demographic blip on the radar: Ranging from between lower middle, middle, then to slightly upper middle class, mostly established within suburbia, caucasian, with two children, a boy and girl.

If there's a ying and yang in a family's siblingry, I was always the more quietly introverted and perceptive to my elder sister's explosively extravagant extroversion. Of course, both of these have these strengths, but, judging from my and others' experiences, I think there's a tendency towards older sisters resenting younger brothers for the parental shift of attention, the female ego not taking kindly to a new entrant soaking up all of her deserved affection and praise. In other words, having a younger brother is prime breeding ground for a ball-busting cunt.

The strategy of parenting for my full-time working Baby boomer elders was first and foremost, appeasement and distraction. Raising kids was more of an errand to run or delay; plomp him in front of the TV, distract him with video games and action movies, send him off to play a variety of sports he's shit at (and the dad can watch them, and latter boast of how much he hated it but went anyway, so you owe him). There I was surprisingly well behaved for most of my early years, considering how marginal of a punishment I would probably get, but I took to the Western ritualised routine of self-subduction eagerly. In that sense, I embraced the treasures of the depersonalised, self-absorbed materialist world of the consumer. A want unsatiated is just a product away.

As my sister and I grew older, the inter-generational differences became more noticeable. A juxtaposition of baby boomers' detached, greedy idealism and Generation Y's whimpering, near-instinctual desolated nihilism.

I always got the impression I was some kind of obstacle to my dad, a pothole in the road to swerve around, or some street constructions to cross the street from. My old man was the epitomy of the dejected Baby Boomer who embraced a token, perverted representation of the 1960s idealism, fantasies of bohemian Hippydom and smoking weed, and then onto the crack pipe of status and greedy materialism, which in the end, consumed and destroyed him. I learnt one thing from my old man that I think we can all learn from baby boomers, do not let your own decadence or escapism control and ruin your life, because it will. It's certainly doing the same to our society.

My mother was the opposite, an absorber of retarded Oprahian ideals of "the power of love"; unpragmatic, a force unto itself, deluded self-esteem boosting, a dereliction of reason and sense, an unhinged maternality unleashed in a world where true femininity is regarded as an unrestrained raw female emotion.

My parents owned a business which propelled them to financial comfort and then compensated their and our lifestyles consequently, soaking in the consumer, status worshiping lifestyle as a part of themselves, their being.
But then, the whole facade of prosperity came crashing down. Borrowing to pay for new cars, profit diminishing, lifestyle downsizing, and eventually going bankrupt once the house of cards collapses in a new, failed venture. The status driven neo-yuppie Baby Boomer who faces this massive shock to their ego and lifestyle will do one of two things: Break down and disintegrate (father), or take the blows, slow down, and eventually learn and adapt (mother). Either way, once you have that lifestyle, more than likely you will continue to submit to that religion. Especially when you lose it.

Things got worse, I got into a serious fight with the old man, who followed suit by calling the police on me to get me arrested and nearly put in jail, kicked out of home at seventeen without any world-weariness, money and few friends to turn to. A dozen or so separations and re-unions later, my mother followed suit, and slowly rebuilt her life, getting a cushy government job. My old man is the same place he's been for the last five years; unstable, unemployed and a perennial victim.

A few miscarriages later, my sister eventually had a baby with her boyfriend, and then, following suit of my parents, split up and re-united a couple times, only to settle at shared custody in the end. If anyone is holding out any hope for Generation Z, you won't find any optimism from me, the coddling, placating and self-absorptive tendencies of our generation's single mothers leaves much to be desired.

In a sense, my family history is more or less a representation of what plenty of the Young White Male of our times has to face, largely. It may not be as up and down and unstable (or it may be plenty worse), but the trend is consistent: a family with a detached or/and weak father, and an overbearing, over-represented mother, whom society embues with the "You go grrrl" idealism of post-feminist doctrine, all contributing to create an individual disconnected from his world, but on fire inside.

Videos for White Nationalists 2: Know Your Enemy

Here's the second rendition of the previous video post. As Youtube has time limits on uploads, most of these are multi-part videos, so I've taken the liberty to add the extra parts in links. You don't have to watch the entirety of these series', but its good to have an idea as to what they are about.



Yuri Bezmenov, former KGB agent on Soviet subversion of the West:


Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7



Kevin Macdonald on Jewish Intellectual Influence on Western Culture:


Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6



Subversive Marketing: The Psychoanalytic Beginnings of Mass Marketing:





Johnathan Bowden on Marxism and Fabian Socialism (Must see):



Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7

The Foaming Tiber of American Mediocrity

We can observe in the non-American Western world, that there is a subtle kind of cultural client state status to the hyper power. Materialist consumerism conquered and occupies nations worldwide, initiated in a sociological blitzkrieg. Indeed, we are taken by storm... a storm of shit. Endless, unrelenting, smugly self-satisfied shit.

Even as early as the 1920s in America, the seeds of consumerism were being sowed. Jewish marketer Edward Bernays, using the psychological know-how of his uncle Sigmund Freud to combine psychology and marketing to sell cigarettes to women, aligning liberty with smoking, and subconsciously aligning it with a challenge to male power. The power to propagandise was nothing new, but the desire and ability to do so via motivation to profit, this was largely a new phenomenon.

Now, the drive towards a more consumer-centric society might have been the inevitable evolution of surging production, (especially necessitated and began by the Industrial Revolution) a need to offload all these goods  to new markets, right? But the fix has become an addiction. Once the allure of cheap luxury items hit the taste buds of Mr and Mrs America, they were hooked, their palate changed permanently. It used to be more production and less consumption, now its no production and all consumption- to the benefit of certain entities.

All of this fits into a narrative- One of the latest incarnations of an endless will to provide the teeming, bursting masses with sufficient bread and circuses. We are units of labour or production in a neo-Marxist's air castle. A means to an end.

But gadget-fetishism and brand loyalty are not the only tools of subversion at hand, they are more of a vehicle for our compartmentalisation of both our lives and us as entities, a vehicle to distract and hedonize our attentions, and to cheapen and misdirect our characters.

A degenerating culture is one where complaining is a way to get things done. The victim narrative is a powerful cultural force, simply for the fact it encourages the masses to do nothing, and wallow in their socially subsidised, decadent mentality. Though, victimhood comes with a price. In adopting the right to void any responsibility for your actions, you must also resign yourself to a life of whimpering and whinging blanketed in a shallow demonstration of meek niceness (Unless you're a protected minority).

On television, the same tune is played. It is all but a indoctrinarian projector for the aforementioned victimhood narrative, watered down egalitarian ideals, the mangina archetype, models of artificial racial cohesion and miscegenation sponsorship, all  ready to be soaked in by the audience's vicarious eyes. Hollywood churns out a feast of decultured profit-maximisers, with no adequately digestible or unique message, but a series of replications of what has come, each new copy slightly louder and more obvious than the latter.

And what of the personification of all these decadent values and machinations? Generation Zero, castrated and largely disarmed of any connection to their heritage, culture, or even sound discernment, are psychologically cut loose, naive in temperament, to float adrift into a barren, vacant sea of subversive elements and media controlled by a hostile foreign elite, with no solid grasp on reality, no worthwhile role models and perpetual dreams of escape. The worse trait is one that is, to some degree, internalized by most White Westerners but especially in the young Whites, in that everyone, from all cultures, ethnic groups and religions, share the same ideas and ethics and sense of fair play as you, in your naive little corner, do:

How close-minded and racist our elders were! Why can't we all be equal, without reference to something as meaningless as skin colour! Ethnic solidarity my arse, only racist white men believe in that shit! 

Only a violent kick from Reality can obliterate that notion. Or can it?

Invoking the Procrustean approach, generation Y solidarity is dependent on your relative mediocrity to the group.  Because even if you have to lob a few legs and arms off, it's worth the price for equality. Anything that keeps you amidst the ranks of the bumbling herd. Intellectual pursuits are frowned upon or looked on with indifference, but fortunately, boundless hedonism is in.

But it's no wonder that our Generation Y and younger are in such a shabby state in the US, especially. The public education systems present ranges from a mediocrity factory to a leftist teacher's personal experiment (aslong as it is the Party Line, that is).

What of the old American virtues; ideals of liberty, justice and freedom? By subversion, the presence they have in the mainstream has largely morphed into nanny statism, prosecution-by-ideology and political correctness, with only a minority of committed loyalists upholding their true, unraped forms.

Present day America's declining empire may be the epicenter of materialistic individual culture, that has become a synonym for its power, but in a sense, we are all Americans now. For Europeans, being engulfed by the Romans was only a matter of geographical distance or your respective force, but in this age of mass-communications, being culturally conquered by the Judeo-Hollywood complex has proven to only be a matter of time, a matter of degree.

In essence, the American Dream has become a nightmare. If you are the average white American male who works hard, you have the right to have your wealth redistributed to hostile aliens, to get married to a pig who will probably divorce you and force you to pay her until you die, to send your children to a school where they will soon be racial minorities and can be sent home for wearing an American flag t-shirt, pay for a baby-boomer pension ponzi scheme you will probably never get yourself. Americans have been sold a pipedream, and until the masses truly realise that it is a mirage, and they're really in a civilisational desert, will things change.

Videos for White Nationalists

Here is but a small collection of Youtube videos I recommend my fellow WN to look into. Check out my channel here for more.

 

David Duke:

David Duke on The Holocaust:

William Pierce:

NXSchell: The Antiracist Hypocrisy:

The great Jared Taylor of Amren "Debates" a Black Lawyer:

A reading of the Bell Curve by Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray, Race and IQ:

Kevin MacDonald:

MrHerrIQ: The Magic Negro Archetype:

Enoch Powell: River of Blood Speech:

Barbara Spektor on the Jewish Role in Immigration:

Entertainment:

Fear and Loathing in the Post Feminist World

It's an undeniable fact to anyone with a sense of impartiality that when it comes to the sexual market, women tend to have it better off, an easier ride, than men. To quote the comedian Jim Jeffries "I've met dwarf sluts, I've never met a dwarf stud... Except maybe in their own realm..." Indeed, for my male brethren, unless you are an active proponent of game, rich, powerful, or the picture of athleticism, you're in for a bit of an uphill slog in terms of the sexual market, these days (unless you're willing to drop your standards). Social power and dominance is the key for men who have any ambitions of coital conquest, and the system won't make it any easier for you.

However, it seems to be that the modern day courting ritual has largely devolved to be an empty void replete with endless series of  inter-gender one up-manships, shit-tests, and general bullshittery. Looking at dating advice columns or books for women further proves my point. A true illustration of our society's total embrace of compartmentalisation and materialism, consummated at the grandiose, strobe-lit alter of our consumer Gods. Everything dressed up as essentially a transaction, a bargain to be made or had. Visceral human nature dressed up in the latest faux-chic threads and tailor made shoes. A juxtaposition of carnal humanity and the marvels of technological advance.

Of course, for those of you with less options or less discerning tastes, there are other options at hand. '

The Futurist predicts that a move towards more realistic sex technology might force women, with diminished power over men in terms of sexual and social appeal, to be compliant and loving towards men. You know, feminine?

However, the outcome I see as much more realistic and in line with the established cultural narrative, is that female interest groups react to the introduction of female sexbots and hyper-realistic holographic virtual reality sex by trying to criminalise all such tech.

This will be a movement, fueled by feminist women and mangina Christian social conservative males, akin to the Temperance movement of the early nineteenth century. Instead of having a butch bullduke behemoth Carrie A. Nation bursting into a saloon and axing barrels full of liquid gold, we'll have slight but masculine feminist executives complete with their post-menopausal mustache making calls and organising rallies to block the sale and distribution of such items. It will be a cloak of puritanism thinly veiling a lust for power.

The temptation for men to withdraw into a cloudy somniferum of hedonism, complete with the latest Xbox console and a High Definition projector for Youporn clips might be tempting, but remember this: The Powers That Be wants you good and sedate. Too satisfied (not with society of course, but with the most recent ejaculation) to lift a finger to change things. It's bread and circuses in the modern world.

Hell, they push masturbation in education as much as they push Ritalin for young boys. Why? Well, it seems to, in high frequency, sap men's vitality, and to keep men nice and pleasantly obedient. In short, to keep you complacent enough about the status quo to leave it be. If you're used to pounding one off when you're stressed or pissed off about things instead of finding a solution or fighting, you're gonna use that stress relief mechanism. Take this literally, or as a metaphor for the current state of affairs, or both. A sort of compartmentalisation of life's problems, by diverting your angst from one part of your life to another, more controllable part where you can vent your energy in a less active way. Now imagine this on a grand scale.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

SWPL of the Week: Why Avatar is a Piece of Garbage Propaganda

Greetings. I haven't done an SWPL of the Week in a while, so what better than to rip into the leftist enviro-fetishistic-treatise-on-European-colonisation-thinly-veiled-in-Scifi-Drama by the dreaded James Cameron?

This is a movie I had heard about and had been meaning to see for a while due to the hype surrounding it. Not so much for the "Zomg good grafix" aspect, but for the political symbolism and leftist rhetoric that it was purported to spout. Now, I won't lie, I eat that shit up like a fat kid eats cake, and couldn't resist an offer to watch it over the holidays.

Note: I intend to spoil the whole plot. Don't worry, you're not missing much.

Avatar is set around 150 years in the future, and the entire movie is set in a different solar system to our own, on a planet called Pandora, which is apparently some kind of living organism where its humanoid inhabitants, the tribal Na'vi, live within and interact with it in a state of unraped harmony. Sound familiar?

Then, of course we have a megalomaniac Earth-based pan-planetary corporation seeking to exploit its most precious resource called-get this- Unobtanium. I'm under the assumption that the corporation, lead by the extremely unconvincing and poorly acted Giovanni Ribisi, which is supposed to represent some kind of White Devil (tm)  imperialist stereotype from history.

Interesting, the Na'vi themselves look like a fusion of many features of SWPL fetishes: Grasshoppers, lions, tribal Amerindians, Zulus and furries, and seem to be largely acted by blacks and hispanics.

SWPL Wet Dream Personified

Back onto the story, we have a protagonist called Jake,  a crippled ex-marine, who is taken on by the corporation to infiltrate a Na'vi community housed on a large supply of Unobtanium, utilising the corporation's technology that allows humans to essentially pilot captured Na'vi bodies as if he were one of them, from a distant location. Of course, being a secret SWPL, his undercover infiltration goes awry as he becomes to empathise with the noble alien savages, and he decides to side with them against the evil White-I mean human corporatists (meanwhile, he is under the control of human technology to exist along side the Na'vi, in a state of stasis in a human device that allows him to pilot the Na'vi body his former friends stole. Humans also cannot breath in the Na'vi home world without oxygen masks. He is also crippled. Do you see where I'm going with this?), and they fight a massive battle in which the Na'vi fight bravely, but sadly endure huge casualties, beginning to lose... Until the ecology and various creatures turn against the humans.

After that, a boss battle ensues between Na'vi Jake and the evil skinhead leader of the PMC hired by the corporation, technology versus mounted beast. To show you where the movie's agenda is aimed, during the melee the skin headed commander asks Na'vi Jake the laughably transparent line: "How does it feel to betray your race?" Of course, the battle is won by the SWPL and their tribal kin, and everything is all peachy as the humans (except a mixed race team of Jake, his bohemian stoner friend, hippy Sigourney Weaver, and a Latino) of the corporation are humiliatingly expelled from the planet forever, and the Na'vi utilise their magical mumbo jumbo voodoo to permanently transfer the injured Jake into permanent Na'vi form.

Aw, what a happy ending.

Not surprisingly, the entirety of the main nemeses to the Na'vi and Jake are all whites- I think the only exception may have been a black foot soldier or two.

So in reality, we have nothing new to see here, just the leftist-progressive equivalent of a cinematic Roman  triumphant through the dystopic remains of the post-Western world. A symbolic parade of masochistic extreme out-group loyalty and self-hatred on display for the entire world to see.

If the West hopes to regain any shred of self-respect, we must evacuate our collectives bowels of any of the glorified anyone-but-us-altruistic nonsense that this movie seems to personify. Make no bones about it, the people, like James Cameron, who pump this shit into the heads of our young and old alike, are our enemies.

The Face of Your Enemy

White Revolution, Activism and Excuses

This article from the Occidental Observer echoed some similiar thoughts I'd had lately about white activism, and the implications of past-and present-strategies present in all spectrums of White groups.

There is a tendency in the most fervent and isolated "White" groups of the past to take things to their logical extreme, take Richard Jay Mathews, for example. He was a white nationalist who formed a group called the Order, who conducted some successful robberies of armoured trucks and banks, and killed a few people. His life ended with a shoot out in his  house with cops in 1984. The whole aim of The Order was to incite some kind of racial conflict or revolution of whites through violence, I guess as some kind of racial nod towards Odinism or some barbarian nonsense and martyrdom, as if barbarity is the spirit of the European soul. 

But is our state of fearful complacently and web-refuge preferable to that? Is no action preferable to violent action?

What I do not process is why do the people who supposedly represent our best racial interests (or at least the ones in notorious groups like that do) try to fight a fourth century war in the twentieth or twenty first century? There's a model for the right way to take and manipulate power and culture, and it is everywhere you look. They're the cultural force that rule now; the liberal-progressive-multiculti establishment. We've been shown again and again with tragedy after tragedy and with each trampled right that most people don't give a shit, what's another 9/11 gonna do, but give the Powers to Be ammunition to squelch more rights and petition more troops for the latest neo-Con conflict? Look at the shameless Judeo-liberal political exploitation of the Jared Loughner shooting.

In the way that cultural Marxism slowly and slightly subverted the West, we can see it was a highly successful policy, even during an alert and paranoid "Cold War" West. That's essentially what should be done, rather than the counter-intuitive activity of murdering a Jewish radio or shooting it out with the police, thinking that these acts of martyrdom will earn any respect or even the slightest notice from the mainstream. will somehow awaken the sleeping masses into action. Fabian socialism? How about Fabian racialism? If the Alinsky approach worked for the leftists, why not for us?

It takes only a small, determined group with power to change the face and constitution of an entire nation. If there is a "racial war", its an instinctual, biological cold war that has existed in and not a physical war, with competing culture and media, and between political ideologies and nation states. Indeed, we have a culture war on our hands and most of us don't even realise it. And we're losing, we're getting our arses handed to us. Why? Well, laziness, fear, brainwashing and ignorance are all factoring in to excuse the majority of the population from any heavy lifting. But for the rest of us enlightened ideologues, its because we are not willing to bend or break the rules to achieve our aims. We have a self-imposed morality that prevents us from taking any action that might actually work, and use that as an excuse to not do anything.

Here's what I prescribe, we as a movement, of individuals or of collective entities, should do to curtail our inevitable societal and demographic decline. If we are to have any hope of advancing our agendas, whether it be paleo-conservativism, libertarianism, White nationalism, or just plain God Damn Survival, this is it:

1. Gain power, as both individuals or as organised, global groups. Put aside our petty differences and realise our common interests in terms of maintaining a white majority and preserving our (non-liberal, non-socialised) European culture.
2. Covertly develop a sense of White identity, in the form of European ethnic groups or a general white European identity, and popularise it with the main white population. Bring awareness to racial differences in testosterone, IQ, and the failures of multiculturalism.
3. Alter and subvert culture and media to be more sympathetic to White Nationalist interests. Paint orthodox liberalism and egalitarian as ugly, hypocritical, corrupt, weak and a failure, in popular and less popular medium. Bring race back into mainstream discourse. Guys like Jared Taylor are crucial at this stage.
4. Use gained power and influence to exercise in the form of: backing WN politicians, sponsoring anti-immigration policies, anti-affirmative action, pro-middle class, .etc,  appealing specifically to whites.
5. Take power.

Anything is preferable to our current position of existing in a nice, safe state of refuge on the internet.

We have to face facts that as a group, we have had crazy fuckers. And now, we have no fuckers.

Reality TV Show: White Re-Education Camp/"Anti-Racism" Experiment

Greeting readers. My sincere apologies for the long lag in posts, due to Christmas holidays and a general lack of inspiration to write. I've found that blogging can be a precarious thing. The drive to do so can diminish dependent on circumstance and external events, and so can the interest in doing so.

But one thing I find that never quite goes away, is my interest in  politics and especially white identity. A natural sense of white ethnocentrism did not hurt, but combine that with a relatively conservative family political upbringing in my earlier years helped cultivate my politics and ideology the way it has.

Here's an interesting piece of reality television. To me, it looks like an audacious, verging on decadent, display of Soviet-style enforcement of white guilt and an escalation of racial tension in the name of the Almighty Lord of the Multiculti (tm). Cultural Marxism at its finest. Even the main villain in this saga, a decrepit, hatred-filled lizard comes off as some disturbing caricature of a sadistic Nazi film character fused with an evil school principal.

All four parts of the experiment:












It's not far-fetched to think a lot of these really fervent anti-racist [anti-white] activists are just looking for a politically correct and socially accepted [and sponsored] medium to spew the enduring venom that corses through their veins. The ideological drug of anti-racism matters little in its substance or truth, but the carthartic release, the chance to demonstrate your spasmodic ire and contempt for the anointed target during the State-sponsored Two Minutes Hate, this is what attracts a large portion of the crowd. The rest are masochistic white liberals, morons, and agenda-driven subverters.

I've touched a bit previously on the decline of England previously, but we can especially see that in these clips that it is becoming a place where the native Anglo Saxon majority is becoming increasingly dispossessed, isolated and victimised. Notice how a lot of non-whites relish in the entire experiment. And I thought only Whites could be racist, hm?

But it stands to reason: This is a country that pays welfare to people who want to destroy their country and make it an Islamic republic, and gives them police protection while they spit on and protest the return of British soldiers.

This is all indicative of a nation ruled by hostile elite. A hostile captain can only sail a ship to its destruction.

Sick society.

Internet Free Speech, about as Free as AIDS

Taken from this fine Youtube channel. I have to echo Pat Hannagan's sentiments here. Wikipedia and Blogspot all have essentially the same freedom of speech problems.

Metal Parrot

Stay tuned for some real content really soon. In the meantime, this:

Mega Metal Mash Up: Black Metal Edition

Because it's Friday and I'm pissed.

Diabolicum - War Tide



Cheers to B-Lode for bringing my attention to this Ukrainian folk black metal group:

Drudkh- Ukrainian Insurgent Army. Excellent introspective musical piece dedicated to the Ukrainian resistance forces to the Soviets/Nazis during WW2.



Drudkh- Furrows of the Gods




More Drudkh




 Drudkh- Solitary Endless Path

 

Bathory- One Rode to Asa Bay


 Bathory- Blood on Ice


Ravenshade- Praise be to Roach. Nice breakdown in this piece around :32 seconds in.



Azaghal- All in Satan



Tunrida- Still in Satan's Embrace



Tunrida- Preacher of Immortality




Urfaust- Vom Geist Der Schwere



Spazmosity Regicide

Lowest Common Denomification

In this world of demeritocracy, of affirmative action hiring policies favouring race and gender over expertise and skill, murderers suing for State-funded compensation for a rough childhood, and any form of rightful discernment via discrimination deemed thoughtcrime, the right to psychologically pillage the masses is reserved by the state and their ultra-rich cohorts, signed away on the bloody dotted line by the people with barely contained jubilation. The talented and brave are persecuted and marginalised, while the stupid and mediocre are appeased and subsidised.

The marketing of the mass media machine is not to customise or specialise their offering to individual consumers, but to standardise consumers so they can more easily digest the offer presented. applying a kind of standard that conforms to the key values sought out at a low common denominator level, to be sure that the largest share of potential consumers are caught in their catchment. "Yes, consumer. We acknowledge you are different... Just like everyone else."

Moral Hypocrisy as Virtue

I've found in my personal life that there exists a skewed and counter-productive moral theme in western society that few seem to pick up on. If you have associated with (especially) teenagers of the Generation Y, you'll notice that being "non-judgmental" seems to be one of the great virtues of our time, comparable to valor in ancient Gaulish tribes, and discipline and dominance in ancient Roman society, though it seems to especially revolve and extend around (homo and bi)sexuality. Indeed, when a generation's virtues largely focus themselves on how others think about what gets their ends wet, it seems we have crossed the threshold of societal autoimmune collapse.

Though, it appears that this misled ideology could be the metholody of cultivating a false Utopian peaceable and amicable setting, unless you suddenly barge in, like me, a vile judge and discriminator of folk. With this, the non-judgmentalists enter into a state of collective psychosis at the prospect of their prized moral being befouled by a ravenous heretic, and virtuously descend upon and scrutinise the pillager of blind-empathetic harmony.

The massively indoctrinated double standard of being "non-judgmental" is supposedly some great and epic virtue, but when it comes to "judgers", its all fair game, here. And its only those who don't fit into the mold of socially accepted multiculti-worshippin', feminism-manginerin',  tradition rapin' sycophants that are nominees for the "non-judgers" to judge without reprive.

It's almost as if these people have been programmed to not know what "judging" is. You're making a moral assessment of someone, which I would think would be an important tool to have in your daily life to ensure survival, and to try to bond with peers who share the same or similar values, and generally make decisions in life. But clearly, in the PC land of doublethink and cultural masochism, your survival is an industry to be nationalised and subsidised by the State. Go back to sleep, kids. The government's in control.

Non-judgementalism seems to parallel a lot with the demonification of  the word and act of "discrimination", evidenced in this gem, that came up in the news recently, with the media squirting its collective panties over a potential "race row" in the Hobbit movie:

 Briton Naz Humphreys, who has Pakistani heritage, attended a casting session in Hamilton last week, queueing for three hours only to be told her skin tone was not suitable, the Waikato Times reported.

"It's 2010 and I still can't believe I'm being discriminated against because I have brown skin," Humphreys told the newspaper.

This is a great example of how Political Correctness has established a stranglehold on certain words and concepts. Discrimination would normally be considered an ability to make a distinction based on differentiations, but even in an innocent act of discrimination such as this in our multiculti-hijacked era, the gears of the white guilt machine shifted in place, planting an expectation in the foolish girl's mind that being non-selected for a role based on her skin colour was automatically indicative of a hidden racial agenda. The implication of being discriminated against alone is justification enough to sound the siren of racial injustice.


PC seems to especially work well on the intellectually vacant, if the following quote by Humphreys is any indication of her dormant facilities:

 ...

" ...They all look kind of homogenised beige..."

Hey retard, have you ever seen a hobbit? They look about as white and Anglo as Winston Churchill. A whore's bleached arsehole is more biege than a hobbit.

Yes, very beige. I think Frodo might have a little Pakistani in him, in fact.

Mainstream "Anti-Racism"; Kill all the White Man

The popular punk-rock band NoFX (all of the attitude and speed of punk with none of relevance and thought) comes through with some socially acceptable white guilt appeasement.

The comment section alone on this video is an epic source of mindless anti-racist drivel juxtaposed with genocidally themed-epithets demonstrating the inherent thoughtlessness in white anti-racists. I implore you all to take a look.



This comment essentially sums up the naive, liberal teen centered in suburbia's thoughts on the video:

ibanezmancons

2 weeks ago

I think it kinda mocks the whole idea of racism, as NoFX are kin to do.
If you think these guys are racist (a band made up of two Jews (Mike and Melv), one hispanic dude (El Hefe) and a white guy who's like the kindest guy ever (Smelly) then I hope you never have children.

 Because Jews and hispanics are never racist, right? Right.

Austrian MP Goes off at Turkish Ambassador.

 It seems like a storm of nationalists in Europe are beginning to stand up and have their say.