Wordpress Site is Up!

Here it is, finally. I've finally made the move over to Wordpress. Remember to change your bookmarks, and to update your blogroll. Go check it out, and be sure to comment!

To Wordpress I Go!

Well, the polls have closed, the results have been tallied, and the the bribes have all been paid out: Looks like I'm moving Johnny Dissidence headquarters to Wordpress.

I've been considering the move from Blogspot for a while now, but only recently had the desire to change really emerged, encouraged by a certain Pat Hannagan. The dark, dreary background of Blogspot was cool at first, but now its starting to look and feel stale, unprofessional and unwieldy. Time for a change.

But now, with the Will of the People (tm) backing the decision to shift blog domains, so there is no looking back now. I'll have finished setting up the new Wordpress blog in the next few days, so until then:

WW2: Why We Didn't Really Win

My latest post is featured at Inmalafide.com, why not go check it out?

"I'm sorry mummy. I don't know what I did wrong."

Trading links with a friend, I came across this rage inducing clip on Youtube:



This news story is a testament to the times we live in. In front of her pleading mother, a  Black female airport screener feels up sorry, frisks a confused six year old little White girl.  The prime demographic for a suicide bomber or a Mexican drug mule, right?


I've got a solution that will completely eliminate any of the issues associated with profiling people being screened for flying. Create two types of air travel companies; Diversity Airways and White Infidel Airways. The people who are so insistent on multiculturalism can have their fix of experiencing wonderful diversity in the form of being subjected to searches at random (maybe even by a Muslim woman, if they get lucky) because obviously, it would be racist to profile based on race. Or gender. Or age. Or any distinguishing traits that might make the process a little more efficient.


From Jared Taylor himself, here's a good refutation of the role racial profiling plays in law enforcement, in that it forms part of a larger profile based on race, age, societal status and appearance. Fools who insist on eliminating any type of profiling in the role of enforcing rules and laws in society are living in fantasy land.

Weighing in on Libya

Yes, this will be my first real post in a while! As I've said in my previous post, I've been pretty swamped with schoolwork lately, which leaves me a drained and jabbering dupe at the end of the day. So... Not different in any real sense.

As you have no doubt heard already, a UN-lead Security Coalition of forces (i.e: A US-lead embarkation of peer-pressured Western powers) began bombing Libya on the 19th of March in order to topple the Gaddafi regime. the Obama administration, with Kid Obama especially coming off as a "hip", young, Marxist wannabe-revolutionary, with ambitions of empowering "da dis'mpow'd masses" has been especially militant in communicating the necessity of US having a hand in "freeing" the Libyan people from their oppressive dictator, that they need democracy, a right to self-determination.

To give a bit of background to Libya and the conflict, Libya is a fairly sparsely populated country situated on the northern Africa coast, with a lot of unsettled desert in between. The population is six million, composed mostly of Arabs, with a large minority (1 million) of illegal Egyptians and sub-Saharan Africans. Muammar Gaddafi, long since a coup d'etat in 1969 has ruled Libya as its "Leader and Guide" in totality but recently has been facing strong opposition and civil warfare, especially emboldened by the recent Tripoli and Egyptian uprisings.  Another important factor with Libya is the fact it is houses the ninth largest oil reserves globally, and is considered a prime market for oil due to its proximity to Europe.

Two Good Mates in Simpler Times

In most cases, it is better the enemy you know. Indeed, Gaddafi may be a sociopathic, socialist blackmailing bastard, but he's familiar, and he has enough animousity directed at him in his region to act as a destabiliser of his power. An unforeseen consequence of USA's fighting tactics, to arm and equip a lesser evil to fight a bigger one or to rebel against it within the society. This diabolically backfired in the faces of the USA in the case of Osama Bin Laden, with the lesser evil triumphing over the greater evil, and becoming a great force in of itself. We should contrast this with the Mujahideen characteristics of the rebel fighters that the West are utilising in fighting Gaddafi, which lays down the framework for a potential Islamic republic to arise out of Libya in the near future. Not surprising, the liberal public distaste towards the Obama intervention in Libya is all but muted, a far-cry from the leftist reaction to Bush entering Iraq, a popularised meme.

Libya is a testament to the failure of African states. Libya, like most of Africa, a mix of different tribes and ethnicities in a continent saturated in ethnocentric tension, and to contrast with the heavy Arabic population, is served up with the added sprinkling of ideological religiosity of Islam, to add to the potential powder keg of potential tension sources.

This Libya intervention should also serve as just another example of agenda-laden America world police at work. The same state that cannot capture and kill Osama, the ever omniscient Road Runner to the US armed force's absurdly over-elaborate, technologically proficient, but ultimately incompetent and self-defeating Wile E. Coyote, felt it prudent embarked on another irrevelant conflict whom costs will be naturally be absorbed by the tax-payers of this UN coalition, true to form to the doctrine of socialising costs and privatising profit. In essence, the major Western powers all involved in this conflict, France, England and the USA all report substantial debts, have no real involvement in the region, and are setting themselves up to have another potential Arabic Islamic state on the horizon, right over the ditch.

Long Absence in Posting

My humblest apologies for not posting in recent times. University is kicking my arse and my balls presently; I'm pretty spent in regards to summoning up the effort to churn out a post, though I have a few in the works I need to work on. Also, I am a part of Inmalafide now, so I should post something there soon. In the meantime:

Mega Metal Mash Up 3

Once again...

Advocating Free Contraceptives to Beneficiaries= Nazism

Sharon Wilson-Davis, a Maori former solo mother and a member of the Welfare Working Group, has been equated to the Nazis for recommending free contraceptives for people on benefits, lifted from here.

Former Green MP Sue Bradford said the group seemed to be "looking to Nazi Germany for inspiration, with its underpinning 'work makes free' philosophy, attempted eugenic control of a portion of the population, and its potential racist implications for Maori".

As usual, leftist rhetoric requires a suspension of disbelief for it to be somewhat digestible to the public, forgetting the racial demographics of the person she is accusing of "Nazi-style" anti-Maori racial eugenic policy. Obviously, facts don't matter when you have a leftist moral agenda to promote, right?

Mrs Wilson-Davis, whose Strive Community Trust runs work transition programmes for sole parents in Mangere, said on Tuesday that she supported both proposals to encourage young women to "make wiser choices".

The problem here is not some crypto-fascist agenda. The problem is that it promotes responsibility in women, and especially in non-White women, in direct violation of the feminist principle that women could have all the choice and privilege with none of the responsibility or hardship to boot. Obviously, this cannot fly with the leftists who buddy up their ideological principles with femarxist ideology, as it'd be in contradiction of the the terms that women were sold in regards to "Female Liberation".

"What are your choices? We have a contraceptive device that is totally subsidised, so that when you are in better circumstances, if you have work or if you meet a lovely man and he's willing to support you, fine, have twins, have whatever. But not while you are in this situation."

           ...

She said the group was not racist, even though it found 31 per cent of all working-aged Maori were on welfare compared with 10 per cent of non-Maori.

This all looks oddly familiar.

Louis Theroux on the "Ultra Zionists" And the Nazis

Louis Theroux. The embarrassing epitome of what has become the English media personality; effeminate, overly-diplomatic, and unabashedly politically correct, Cam correctly pointed out the stark contrast with this wimpy she-boy and a real man, like the late Terre Blanche. He has departed on numerous journeys out in the world to see numerous extreme subcultures, from American negro inner-city gang bangers, to Black Muslim nationalists and even the Afrikaner Resistance Movement in South Africa. But I'll be contrasting the documentation and portrayal of two vibrant extremes by the BBC frontman, The Zionists and the neo-Nazis. Let's find out which one gets the least biased coverage by Theroux.

Louis Theroux, and the Ultra Zionists

Barely five minutes into the Ultra Zionists, he shows his hand of cards face up. Consider the limp-wristed, pedantic way he talks to a Zionist Jew on the illegal expansion policies of Israel into east Jerusalem:

"Don't you feel... uhh... that you're ...uh...partially...uh..  responsible for putting those kids [in east Jerusalem settlements] in harm's way?"

Upon witnessing an argument between a Zionist Israeli and a Palestinian, he apologetically injects the fact that "The international community is on his side [Palestinians] in that it doesn't recognise your rights in this region, and sees you as an interloper." An undercurrent of fear was ever present. His  reluctance to slightly critique is palpable, whether it be fear for his personage physically or the potential fallout socially (with his media buddies), remains to be seen. But the impression you're given is that, at best, he is a passive spectator into an alternative community practicing an alternative ideology. At worst, he is a protected tourist in a divided country with potentially hazardous zones. As with many things, this is not the case.

The most disturbing part of the ultra-Zionists, was the good goyim Christians working for free to help out Israel. One especially delusional puritan goy even wanted to join the IDF. Metaphorically, this personifies the deeply Judaified, heavily religious American Christians, duped into buying and fighting the Iraq war, and are now gearing up to spill blood in Iran.

Even the name "Ultra-Zionists" are not meant to elicit much fear or emotion as labeling someone a "far-right extremist" as many are in the media.

Overall, he presents an only slightly morally biased account of the Israelis usurping Palestinian territory. His narration, a sober, meek monotone portraying the events from a perspective of an impartial observer. But if you came to see a wimpy, libtarded coward moralise smugly and supremely, you haven't see anything yet.

Louis Theroux, and the Nazis

At the start of the episode, the tone is set; Theroux had set out on a moral crusade. "Do you consider other people's feelings?" He inquires an oddball WN mother taping down a Swastika onto her kitchen floor. The contrast with the Zionists is vividly presented. This formerly quivering, apologetic coward, now a big brave battler of this naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

Meeting Tom Metzger is the same deal, but even worse. He initiates his liberal moral outrage mode in relation to Metzger claiming blacks commit more violent crimes and how the justice system is geared against White racial loyalty, but they quickly recover this indiscretion and become something reminiscent of friendly. Embarrassingly, Theroux has a tendency towards trying to be the liberal, almost Calvinist in character priest; Trying to extract a confession or repudiation of their evil, sinful ways.

Upon meeting a group of skinheads, he morally castigates them for asking if he was Jewish, and cheekily declines to answer (even though they promised to kick his arse off camera if he was). This demonstrates the lack of fear in regard to his morally mandated enemy; he is the eternal invincible liberal ubermensch facing off against the ideological scourge victoriously. Of course, his colour blind antiracial shield was up!

Louis effortlessly oozes disgust over the neo-Nazi supremacists and their ideology, but forces himself to demonstrate something reminiscent of sympathy for the Israeli cause. I can hardly blame him for being afraid of the Zionists extremists in their own country, but the unequivocal lack of respect he has for the US Nazis, and the naively deluded, colour-blind way he approached the post-apartheid South Africa Boer warriors like Eugene Terre Blanche compounded by the irrational multiculti, antiracist message he is sent out to promote, makes his socio-political bias too overwhelming  take him seriously. He is an emasculated, moral coward posing as a reporter or "exposer" of extremist groups, with a thinly veiled agenda to promote. Nothing more.

Though I'd have to add, at a greater level, the people he met in this episode were symbolic of the collapse and smoldering ruin of Nazi ideals and the constantly reinforced archetype in the mainstream; they become a joke, an ideological laughing stock, the last refuge of the vulgar and hypocritical mongoloid subhuman haters. In the end, both groups hold extreme nationalist/supremacist ideologies (though I'd say definitely that the pseudo-Nazis are merely attention-seeking, street trash morons and should not resemble anything NEAR a public voice for racially conscious Whites), but which one is actively pursuing their ambitions and displacing their foes? And contrast that with whom earns the most moral contempt and smug admonition by high priest Theroux, the real star of the show. The results are indicative of a society in need of a big fix, and timely.