It's finally happened: The 9/11-inquiring Two and Half Men star Charlie Sheen has had his show dropped. The cause? Well, a major rant aimed partially at his show's Jewish co-creator, Chuck Lorre. He even referred to his uber-Judaic birth name, a *gasp* major no-no in Hollywood.
Now, I don't particularly harbour any special respect for Sheen, nor was I a follower of his show (I don't watch television) and he's coming off as indefensibly obnoxious and a haughty cock, but this allows for some elaboration on the ethno-politics of the Western media, and perhaps on the West as a whole: When leftist or neocon Jews get butt-hurt, a minor anal fissure transforms into a major fucking tectonic rupture. Highly ethnocentric personal connections in Hollywood means the goyim can't go around saying what they wish. Or point out certain truths. It's all in who you are, and who you know, and how much you prostrate yourself to your masters.
Indeed, Sheen's just another easy target for the media to sink their hooks into. This follows a trend, and it's got zero to do with Sheen's purported lifestyle degeneration and debauchery. Parallels can be easily drawn to the ongoing Mel Gibson saga, initiated with a drunken rant and arrest, and then later a segway into suspicious publicised recordings rage-filled rants against his ex-wife, and it's clear why: He wouldn't play ball with the ideological pitchers of Hollywood. Examining the list of movies he's been involved with: The Patriot, Braveheart, Apocalypto and Passions of the Christ; movies that did not preach liberalistic values of egalitarianism, dis-empowered Caucasians or ubermensch noble savages, especially the latter, which gave an unwanted revival of a Christian viewpoint on the life of Jesus, seen as "anti-Semitic". This was the final straw for Gibson.
The double standard is illuminated especially with Alec Baldwin, his much publicised abusive call to his daughter was quickly extinguished by the powers to be, losing its stopping power abruptly as he was embraced by Hollywood, given a fancy new TV show. Why? A certain ideological tendency of his.
It's the same story in Australia. Brendan O'Connell, a pro-Palestinian activist whom filmed his ideological battles and protests against Israeli Zionists and broadcasted them on Youtube, received a sentence of eighteen months in jail. If any Australians think they lived in a free state, think again. And if any New Zealanders think we're totally immune from thought crime offenses, I'd start reconsidering that viewpoint, if Australia is any example to go by.
When it comes to the media, there's special rules and regulations when it comes to commenting on minority and special interest groups, yet it's a free-for-all for those targeting Europids in mainstream medium. Naturally, it's self-evident that Whites are the oppressive, racist group. In fact, the burden of proof is on every White to prove they are not so, preferably via having no children, miscegnating, or generally being a pathetic and weak character who has an inability to defend himself, and submerges himself in distraction and decadence. Of course, what other race would allow their elites to invite so many of the third world into their lands without pause or organised opposition?! Clearly they must have a sinister agenda. No Whites really believe in all this egalitarian, blank state bollocks, do they?
Showing posts with label hollywood liberal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hollywood liberal. Show all posts
Saturday, February 26, 2011
Saturday, November 27, 2010
SWPL of the Week : Leonardo Dicaprio, Hollywood Leftist Tackles Tiger Extinction
Recently, these two unlikely figures became poster boys for the latest SWPL display of misplaced altruis-I mean a summit on saving the tiger.
Of course, what better place to focus your misplaced leftist universalist loyalty, than a carnivorous beast who would not hesitate to eat you given half a chance? I can understand Putin's angle, the perpetual Bond villian trying for some good 'ol fashioned Western liberal publicity. What better way to demonstrate to your covert enemies' "elites" that you're like them than showing you care for the same irrelevant causes?
The elitist Hollywood liberal angle is something different entirely. For, to demonstrate you're one of them, you have to show that you have the same level of nihilistic contempt for your fellow man's struggle (unless it is as far removed as possible from your own demographic) while cheerleading for some irrelevant cause. This seems like the case with Dicaprio, he has to pay the piper in terms of showing he's part of the "The Hollywood Club".
In a healthy and upwardly mobile society, a demonstration of altruism would extend typically to one's own group, or, ingroup altruism, as Kevin Macdonald would call it. With all the racially motivated killings against whites in South Africa, the non-SWPL equivalent of attending a tiger conservation summit might be attending a SA Boer conservation summit, as their collective life expectancy doesn't look too hot, either. But in this highly individualist Western psychological climate, whites are less inclined to have any kind of group loyalty based on cultural or racial tradition, especially in the United States, the mecca of cultural Marxism.
In some ways, this couples itself with a more benign and less viscerally masochistic version of the Amy Biehl case. An upper class white girl goes out to South Africa to campaign against apartheid, and then is indiscriminately murdered by the very people she wants to free, which can only be worsened by her parents campaigning to have their daughter's killers excluded from the death penalty, and shaking their hands. Irony at its finest, or is it? If the Amy Biehl case is a cautionary tale of extreme liberal outgroup loyalty, this is a less severe version of the same affliction, coated in a glaze of self-satisfied apathy.
An inane cause like protecting an animal you will possibly only ever encounter only in zoos, which is lucky, because meeting it anywhere else will result in you becoming its dinner is a good example of how far removed SWPL interests are to the common man, and to common sense. For the SPWL crowd, the much coveted display of extreme outgroup loyalty doesn't have to even extend to culturally/ethnically alien people. Indeed, in this case, the only similiarity and common identity being that they both are a mammalian class of vertebrate.
Of course, what better place to focus your misplaced leftist universalist loyalty, than a carnivorous beast who would not hesitate to eat you given half a chance? I can understand Putin's angle, the perpetual Bond villian trying for some good 'ol fashioned Western liberal publicity. What better way to demonstrate to your covert enemies' "elites" that you're like them than showing you care for the same irrelevant causes?
The elitist Hollywood liberal angle is something different entirely. For, to demonstrate you're one of them, you have to show that you have the same level of nihilistic contempt for your fellow man's struggle (unless it is as far removed as possible from your own demographic) while cheerleading for some irrelevant cause. This seems like the case with Dicaprio, he has to pay the piper in terms of showing he's part of the "The Hollywood Club".
In a healthy and upwardly mobile society, a demonstration of altruism would extend typically to one's own group, or, ingroup altruism, as Kevin Macdonald would call it. With all the racially motivated killings against whites in South Africa, the non-SWPL equivalent of attending a tiger conservation summit might be attending a SA Boer conservation summit, as their collective life expectancy doesn't look too hot, either. But in this highly individualist Western psychological climate, whites are less inclined to have any kind of group loyalty based on cultural or racial tradition, especially in the United States, the mecca of cultural Marxism.
In some ways, this couples itself with a more benign and less viscerally masochistic version of the Amy Biehl case. An upper class white girl goes out to South Africa to campaign against apartheid, and then is indiscriminately murdered by the very people she wants to free, which can only be worsened by her parents campaigning to have their daughter's killers excluded from the death penalty, and shaking their hands. Irony at its finest, or is it? If the Amy Biehl case is a cautionary tale of extreme liberal outgroup loyalty, this is a less severe version of the same affliction, coated in a glaze of self-satisfied apathy.
An inane cause like protecting an animal you will possibly only ever encounter only in zoos, which is lucky, because meeting it anywhere else will result in you becoming its dinner is a good example of how far removed SWPL interests are to the common man, and to common sense. For the SPWL crowd, the much coveted display of extreme outgroup loyalty doesn't have to even extend to culturally/ethnically alien people. Indeed, in this case, the only similiarity and common identity being that they both are a mammalian class of vertebrate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
